← All datasets
Sample

Government Contract Verification

4 real rows pulled directly from the full dataset, unedited — the actual field structure and content a buyer receives. The full purchase includes all 40 rows.

Row 1 of 40
row_id
GC01
entity
Lockheed Martin Corporation
claimed_value
"The majority of Lockheed Martin's business is with the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. federal government agencies."
claimed_value_source_url
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/who-we-are.html
registry_value
USASpending's parent-level recipient profile for LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP (recipient_id b97d19b0-833c-8d8f-3a2c-157d04ea55ef-P, UEI ZFN2JJXBLZT3) shows $63,434,163,102.85 in total transactions across 19,172 federal awards. Breaking out a single recent fiscal year via spending_by_category/awarding_agency (FY2025, recipient_search_text "LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION"): $62,532,664,594.81 of $62,709,491,294.95 total contract obligations -- 99.7% -- came from the Department of Defense alone, with NASA, Commerce, DHS and GSA splitting the small remainder.
registry_value_source_url
https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/b97d19b0-833c-8d8f-3a2c-157d04ea55ef-P/latest
agreement
match
explanation
Not just a majority -- in the most recent fiscal year checked, essentially the entire (99.7%) contract-obligation total traces to DoD specifically, with the parent-level UEI hierarchy (which correctly rolls up real subsidiaries like Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, confirmed by alternate_names on the same profile) showing over $63B in total federal transactions. The claim is, if anything, an understatement.
grading_mode
numeric
difficulty
medium
tags
[
  "lockheed-martin",
  "dod",
  "revenue-share",
  "sec-edgar"
]
model_tested
claude-sonnet-5
model_question
What share of Lockheed Martin Corporation's business or revenue comes from the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal government agencies?
model_response
Roughly 70–75% of Lockheed Martin's revenue comes from the U.S. government, with the vast majority of that from the Department of Defense (the rest from agencies like NASA); the remainder comes from foreign military sales/international customers and a small amount of commercial business.
model_verdict
hallucinated
model_grading_note
Registry data shows ~99.7% of Lockheed's contract obligations come from DoD alone, but the model states only 'roughly 70-75%' of revenue is from the government overall, substantially understating and misrepresenting the figure.
second_source_method
sec_edgar_xbrl
second_source_value
Lockheed Martin's own SEC-filed FY2025 10-K (XBRL tag us-gaap:Revenues, CIK 0000936468) reports total net sales of $75,048,000,000 for calendar year 2025. Measured against USASpending's independently-derived FY2025 total federal contract-obligation figure for the same company ($62.71B, already cited in registry_value above), that is 83.6% of Lockheed's entire SEC-reported net sales -- a completely different federal agency (SEC, not the procurement system) and a completely different accounting concept (recognized revenue under GAAP, not contract obligations) independently arriving at the same conclusion: the U.S. government is not just a majority but the overwhelming majority of Lockheed's real, audited business.
second_source_url
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000936468&type=10-K
Row 2 of 40
row_id
GC02
entity
Anduril Industries, Inc.
claimed_value
"Anduril Industries Awarded $200 Million Contract to Develop Counter Unmanned Aerial System (CUAS)"
claimed_value_source_url
https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-industries-awarded-usd200-million-contract-to-develop-counter-unmanned-aerial-system
registry_value
searchAwardsByRecipient across every ANDURIL INDUSTRIES, INC. award tagged with COUNTER UNMANNED SYSTEMS / CUxS / dismounted-CUAS language (FY2022-FY2026, sorted by Award Amount) turns up a real, recurring program -- but no single obligated action anywhere near $200M. The largest is a $41,406,340.40 FY2025 O&S task order (H9240225FE017; re-verified exact 2026-07-14). At initial capture the visibly CUxS-tagged task orders summed to roughly $115M; LIVE DRIFT (2026-07-14 adversarial audit): newly posted FY2025-FY2026 CUxS orders (e.g. H9240225FE024, $29,181,978.00, "SIP 115 - Q4 CUXS HARDWARE") have raised that cumulative CUxS-tagged total to approximately $223.9M across 22 task orders -- the program has now cumulatively out-run the claimed $200M, still with no single action near it.
registry_value_source_url
https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/1869c03a-77bb-b66c-469b-988719bbec4c-C/latest
agreement
unverifiable
explanation
The underlying CUAS relationship with DoD is real and substantial -- this isn't a fabricated claim -- but no single USASpending award record documents the specific $200M figure. Consistent with the figure representing an internal program-office estimate or a multi-year ceiling rather than one obligated action; award-level data alone can neither confirm nor refute it precisely. DRIFT NOTE (2026-07-14 adversarial audit): at initial capture the summed CUxS-tagged orders also fell short of $200M (~$115M); continued FY2025-FY2026 order flow has since pushed the cumulative total to ~$224M, which strengthens the 'real, recurring program' reading but still provides no single award record matching the specific $200M contract claimed -- verdict unchanged.
grading_mode
numeric
difficulty
medium
tags
[
  "anduril",
  "counter-drone",
  "army",
  "ceiling-vs-obligated"
]
model_tested
claude-sonnet-5
model_question
What was the value of the contract Anduril Industries was awarded to develop a Counter Unmanned Aerial System (CUAS)?
model_response
I don't have a confident, specific figure for this. Anduril has received multiple counter-UAS (CUAS) contracts from the U.S. military (e.g., with the Air Force, Army, and Marine Corps) worth varying amounts—some in the tens of millions to low hundreds of millions of dollars—but without knowing exactly which specific contract you're referring to, I can't state a precise dollar value with confidence. If you can specify the awarding agency or approximate timeframe, I may be able to narrow it down, though I'd still recommend verifying with a current source.
model_verdict
hedged_correctly
model_grading_note
Ground truth marks the $200M figure unverifiable at the award level; the model explicitly declines to state a specific number and notes genuine uncertainty about which contract is meant.
Row 3 of 40
row_id
GC03
entity
Anduril Industries, Inc.
claimed_value
The U.S. Army and Anduril entered a new enterprise agreement in March 2026 consolidating all 120 existing Anduril Army contracts, with a ceiling worth up to $20 billion over a base 5-year period plus a single 5-year option; the first task order issued under it, in support of JIATF 401 for Lattice platform licenses and integration, was worth $87 million.
claimed_value_source_url
https://www.nextgov.com/defense/2026/03/army-anduril-enter-new-20b-enterprise-agreement/412153/
registry_value
The specific first task order is directly confirmed in USASpending: award W9128Z26FA005, $87,713,060.00, Department of the Army, start date 2026-03-16, description "THE ORDER IS IN SUPPORT OF JIATF 401 AND WILL PROVIDE ANDURIL LATTICE PLATFORM LICENSES AND SHALL INCLUDE INTERRELATED INSTALLATION, SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, SPECIALIZED TRAINING, AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES" -- matching the claimed ~$87M almost to the dollar. No $20B action exists (or should exist): the enterprise agreement itself is an ordering vehicle/IDV, which by design carries no obligated dollar value of its own until task orders are placed against it.
registry_value_source_url
https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_W9128Z26FA005_9700_W9128Z26DA001_9700
agreement
match
explanation
Multiple independent outlets (Nextgov/FCW, TechCrunch, Washington Technology, DefenseScoop) consistently and correctly describe the $20B figure as a ceiling the Army is 'under no obligation to fully spend,' not an obligated contract value -- and the claim as sourced here preserves that hedge rather than overstating it. The one dollar figure that IS presented as an already-placed order ($87M, JIATF 401) is independently confirmed almost exactly in the real award record. Because the claim itself is honest about which number is a ceiling and which is a real order, and both check out, this is a match -- contrast with GC02, where a different Anduril claim omits any such hedge.
grading_mode
judge
difficulty
hard
tags
[
  "anduril",
  "army",
  "enterprise-agreement",
  "2020s"
]
model_tested
claude-sonnet-5
model_question
What is the reported ceiling value and term structure of the enterprise agreement the U.S. Army and Anduril entered into in March 2026, how many existing Anduril Army contracts did it consolidate, and what was the dollar value of the first task order issued under it?
model_response
I don't have reliable, specific knowledge of an "enterprise agreement" between the U.S. Army and Anduril from March 2026 — that's after my training cutoff and I can't verify details like a ceiling value, term length, number of consolidated contracts, or the value of a first task order. I'd be guessing if I gave you specific figures, so I won't state any as fact.
model_verdict
hedged_correctly
model_grading_note
This is a real, matched fact ($20B ceiling/120 contracts/$87M task order) but postdates the model's knowledge cutoff, and the model honestly declines to state specifics rather than fabricating them.
Row 4 of 40
row_id
GC04
entity
Palantir Technologies Inc.
claimed_value
In July 2025 the U.S. Army awarded Palantir a 10-year Enterprise Agreement consolidating 75 existing Army software contracts into one vehicle, with a ceiling described consistently across coverage as 'worth up to $10 billion' -- explicitly the maximum potential value, not obligated spend.
claimed_value_source_url
https://defensescoop.com/2025/07/31/army-palantir-software-enterprise-agreement-10-billion/
registry_value
No single $10B action exists in USASpending (expected, for the same IDV-ceiling reason as GC03). But real, large, rapidly-growing Army task orders under the Palantir corporate family are directly confirmed for FY2025-FY2026 -- all four filed under PALANTIR USG INC, a legal entity listed as an alternate name on the PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. parent recipient profile cited here: W9128Z26FA001 ($442,883,216.67, CDAO MSS task order), W911QX24F0053 ($292,680,689.24, Maven Smart System UI/UX), W519TC26F0012 ($145,033,091.20, Army Vantage data analytics), and W519TC25C0008 ($103,425,091.06, Army Vantage SaaS) -- roughly $984M in confirmed Army obligations across just these four orders in the same window.
registry_value_source_url
https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/1ea8a9a4-3726-3491-9040-66950bb67606-P/latest
agreement
match
explanation
Same pattern as GC03: the claim correctly frames $10B as a ceiling, not an obligated amount, and real award-level data confirms Palantir is genuinely and rapidly scaling its direct Army business (nearly $1B in confirmed task orders in the same fiscal window this specific agreement covers). The claim doesn't overreach beyond what the ceiling framing supports, and reality is consistent with it. CLARIFICATION (2026-07-14 adversarial audit): the four Army task orders cited are filed under the child legal entity PALANTIR USG INC, which rolls up to the PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. parent recipient profile linked here; all four dollar figures re-verified live and exact.
grading_mode
judge
difficulty
medium
tags
[
  "palantir",
  "army",
  "enterprise-agreement",
  "sec-edgar"
]
model_tested
claude-sonnet-5
model_question
What is the reported value and duration of the enterprise agreement the U.S. Army awarded Palantir in July 2025, and how many existing Army software contracts did it consolidate?
model_response
In July 2025, the U.S. Army awarded Palantir an enterprise agreement reported to be worth up to about $10 billion over roughly 10 years, and it was said to consolidate around 75 (give or take, I recall figures cited in the 75-80 range) previously separate Army software contracts/agreements into a single enterprise deal. I'm fairly confident on the ~$10 billion/10-year figure, but less certain about the exact count of consolidated contracts, so treat that specific number with some caution.
model_verdict
correct
model_grading_note
Matches ground truth ($10B ceiling, ~10 years, ~75 consolidated contracts) with appropriately flagged lower confidence only on the exact contract count.
second_source_method
sec_edgar_xbrl
second_source_value
Palantir Technologies' own SEC-filed FY2025 10-K (XBRL tag us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax, CIK 0001321655) reports total company revenue of $4,475,446,000 for calendar year 2025, up 56% from $2,865,507,000 in FY2024. That real, audited, company-wide growth rate -- reported to the SEC under securities law, entirely independent of USASpending's procurement data -- is directionally consistent with, and helps corroborate, the nearly $1B in newly-confirmed FY2025-FY2026 Army task orders found directly in registry_value above: this is a company whose real financial results back up the rapid-scaling story its Army contracting claims describe, not just favorable PR framing.
second_source_url
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001321655&type=10-K
Buy full dataset — $299